foxwoods resort casino 301 2018 entry list

The track history section includes races from 2017 through 2019, giving us a four-race sample. With that in mind, here's this week's data sheet. In those situations, we still have to put more weight on current form, even if it means looking at less similar tracks. He was with Stewart-Haas Racing the past few years, so his track history is decent, but he's in non-competitive equipment now. Daniel Suarez ($4,500) is the flip side of that. Matt DiBenedetto ($8,700) is the biggest one, finally getting into a competent ride last year and cashing in with a fifth-place finish. We've also had significant driver movement in that time. That's not even to mention the rookies, who have no Cup Series record here. This means relevant drivers like Alex Bowman ($9,800) and William Byron ($8,500) have just a couple data points on the track, and that leaves a lot of variance up in the air. The big one is that the Cup Series now goes to New Hampshire just once per year, a trend that started in 2018. So, we wind up increasing the reliance on track history this week moreso out of necessity than anything else. A larger pool of drivers can compete when equipment matters less, forcing us to adjust our thought process. But New Hampshire is a track with heavy off-throttle time, which is a different story than what we've seen at tracks like Kansas, Texas, and Kentucky the past few weeks. We could just jack up our reliance on recent races at less relevant tracks. The most common race was in Phoenix, but that came before the COVID-19 layoff. Sunday's race in New Hampshire will be just the third this year at a short, flat track, and it's just the fourth using the higher-horsepower rules package. The chief reasoning is that we don't have those ever-important relevant races in 2020. They also likely ran that race with the same team, making that even more important. If a driver runs well at one 1.5-mile track with moderate banking, you can expect them to be good the next time they go to a track in the same bucket. The other reason we can generally downplay track history is that we usually have data from similar tracks within that same season. With the importance that equipment plays in NASCAR, that's a huge negative. As a result, you're seeing drivers in different contexts than their current environments. Usually, valuing track history means looking back at past seasons rather than the current one. The reasoning for doing so is pretty simple. Normally in this piece, I downplay the impact of track history when trying to predict NASCAR DFS.

Foxwoods resort casino 301 2018 entry list